Philadelphia Campaign > Battle of Short Hills

Battle of Short Hills

Background

The Battle of Short Hills, fought on June 26, 1777, was an engagement during the American Revolutionary War between American forces under General George Washington and British troops commanded by General Sir William Howe. This battle took place in the area around Scotch Plains and Edison, New Jersey, and is notable for Washington's successful tactics in avoiding a larger confrontation and preventing the British from achieving their objectives.

Background:

1. Strategic Context:

   • In the spring of 1777, British forces under General Howe were based in New York City, planning operations to capture Philadelphia, the seat of the Continental Congress. To achieve this, Howe aimed to engage and defeat Washington’s Continental Army, thereby clearing the way for a march to Philadelphia.
   • Washington, aware of Howe's intentions, positioned his forces strategically to monitor British movements and protect the American heartland.

2. American Forces:

   • General George Washington commanded approximately 11,000 men, including Continental Army regulars and militia. His forces were encamped in the Watchung Mountains, a strong defensive position offering a vantage point to observe British movements.

3. British Movements:

   • General Howe, aiming to draw Washington into a decisive battle, left his base in New Brunswick with a force of around 18,000 troops, including British regulars, Hessian mercenaries, and Loyalists. Howe attempted to outflank Washington's position and force a battle.

The Battle:

1. Initial Movements:

   • On June 26, 1777, Howe split his army into two columns, intending to outmaneuver Washington’s forces. One column, led by General Cornwallis, moved towards the American right flank, while the other column, led by General Howe himself, advanced directly towards the center.

2. American Reconnaissance:

   • Washington’s scouts detected the British movements early on, allowing him to prepare a response. Washington decided to engage in a series of delaying actions to slow the British advance and avoid being outflanked.

3. Engagement at Short Hills:

   • The American forces, including detachments under General William Alexander (Lord Stirling) and General Nathanael Greene, engaged the British in a series of skirmishes near Short Hills (modern-day Scotch Plains and Edison).
   • The Americans used the terrain to their advantage, conducting hit-and-run attacks and utilizing the cover of the woods and hills to harass the British columns.

4. British Advance and American Defense:

   • The British columns pressed forward, encountering stiff resistance from American skirmishers. The fighting was intense, with the Americans effectively using artillery and musket fire to slow the British advance.
   • Despite the British numerical superiority, the American forces managed to delay the British sufficiently, preventing them from achieving a decisive breakthrough.

5. Washington's Strategic Withdrawal:

   • Recognizing the risk of being encircled, Washington ordered a strategic withdrawal to the safety of the Watchung Mountains. The American forces executed a disciplined retreat, maintaining cohesion and preventing the British from exploiting any weaknesses.
   • The British, unable to force a decisive engagement, eventually halted their advance and withdrew, realizing they could not draw Washington into a major battle.

Aftermath and Impact:

1. Casualties:

   • The battle resulted in relatively light casualties for both sides. American losses were estimated at around 70 killed and wounded, while British casualties were slightly higher, with approximately 100 killed and wounded.

2. Tactical Outcome:

   • The Battle of Short Hills was a tactical success for the Americans. Washington’s use of delaying tactics and strategic withdrawal prevented the British from achieving their objectives and safeguarded the Continental Army from a potentially disastrous engagement.
   • The engagement demonstrated Washington's ability to use mobility, reconnaissance, and the natural terrain to offset British numerical and tactical superiority.

3. Strategic Consequences:

   • The battle reinforced Washington's strategy of avoiding large-scale confrontations unless conditions were favorable. This approach allowed the Continental Army to preserve its strength and continue to harass and disrupt British operations.
   • The British, frustrated in their attempts to engage Washington decisively, eventually shifted their focus to the campaign to capture Philadelphia, leading to the subsequent battles of Brandywine and Germantown.

Significance:

• American Tactical Success: The Battle of Short Hills highlighted Washington’s effective use of tactical flexibility and the strategic value of delaying actions and reconnaissance in warfare.
• British Frustration: The engagement demonstrated the challenges faced by the British in bringing the Continental Army to a decisive battle, showcasing the effectiveness of American defensive strategies.
• Continued Resistance: The battle underscored the resilience and adaptability of the American forces, contributing to their ability to sustain the war effort and continue resisting British advances.

The Battle of Short Hills remains a notable example of the strategic and tactical acumen displayed by General George Washington and the Continental Army, illustrating their ability to outmaneuver and frustrate British forces during the American Revolutionary War.

Philadelphia Campaign

Campaign Battles

Sources

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources